Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in Uruguay using Ecological Footprint as a Measure of Environmental Degradation

Authors

Abstract

This paper, using data for the time period 1971-2014, analyzes the relationship between GDP per capita, foreign direct investment, energy use per capita, and environmental degradation measured by the Ecological Footprint in Uruguay. It also tests whether the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis holds. While environmental degradation is positively related with energy use per capita in the long run, its relationship with foreign direct investment in the long-run is negative. The inverted U-shaped relationship between GDP per capita and environmental degradation implies that the EKC hypothesis is verified. The policy recommendations include the implementation of measures leading to more energy saving and more efficient use of energy, investing in cleaner and more efficient technologies, and policies that would increment the share of modern renewable sources in energy consumption.

Keywords: Environmental Kuznets Curve, Ecological Footprint, Gross Domestic Product per Capita, Energy Use, Foreign Direct Investment, Uruguay

JEL Classifications: Q4, Q53

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.9361

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Selim Jürgen Ergun, Middle East Technical University Northern Cyprus Campus

Economics Program, Assistant Professor

Maria Fernanda Rivas, Middle East Technical University Northern Cyprus Campus

Economics Program, Associate Professor

Downloads

Published

2020-05-16

How to Cite

Ergun, S. J., & Rivas, M. F. (2020). Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in Uruguay using Ecological Footprint as a Measure of Environmental Degradation. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10(4), 473–485. Retrieved from https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/9361

Issue

Section

Articles